Legal Opinion
HITCH v. THE FRICK PITTSBURGH
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 21, 2023No. 2:22-cv-01801Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JAMES E. HITCH, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 2:22-cv-1801 Vv. Hon. William S. Stickman IV THE FRICK PITTSBURGH, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLIAM S. STICKMAN IV, United States District Judge Plaintiff James E. Hitch (“Hitch”) filed suit against Defendant The Frick Pittsburgh (“The Frick”), alleging that The Frick discriminated against him because of a disability and retaliated against him for reporting his disability and requesting reasonable accommodations. Hitch brings claims! for discrimination under the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.