Legal Opinion
In re Jason C.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 27, 2001No. SC 16314; SC 16315PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
These companion cases require this court to determine whether a juvenile’s plea of nolo contendere is invalid when the juvenile has not been advised that his or her plea could result in an extension of his or her commitment. The Superior Court for Juvenile Matters, following plea agreements, committed the two juvenile respondents, Jason C. and Greily L., to the department of children and families (department) for eighteen months. During those delinquency commitments, the department, pursuant to General Statutes § 46b-141 (b),1 filed petitions to extend the respondents’…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Allison G.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. T.D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. TDSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- In re William D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. GroppiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.