Andreucci v. City of New Haven
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PENDING MOTIONS
DORSEY, Chief Judge.
Defendants move for summary judgment on plaintiffs’ due process and equal protection .claims, and plaintiffs cross-move for summary judgment on the due process claim. For the reasons below, defendants’ and plaintiffs’ motions are, respectively, granted and denied.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs are New Haven firefighters. Six plaintiffs were promoted to the rank of lieutenant in 1988 and 1989, and two plaintiffs were appointed as battalion chiefs in 1988. Plaintiffs served in these positions for periods of up to five years.
Under the city charter,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cummings v. BridgeportDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- Violissi v. City of MiddletownDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1998