Legal Opinion
Violissi v. City of Middletown
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 12, 1998No. 3:96CV01694 (GLG)Published
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Decision
GOETTEL, District Judge.
In a thirteen-count complaint, plaintiff Frank Violissi challenges the City of Middle-*94town’s failure to promote him to police lieutenant due to alleged irregularities in the examination process. Plaintiff invokes this Court’s jurisdiction pursuant to. 28 U.S.C. § 1331, based upon his claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., defendants have moved for summary judgment as to all counts of plaintiffs amended complaint [Doc. #. 33]. Plaintiff has responded to defendants’ motion, but has also moved for a continuance, pursuant to Rule…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- John C. Donahue v. Windsor Locks Board of Fire Commissioners, John R. Colli, Jr., Russell C. Gabrielson, and John R. Colli, IIICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Joseph Paskvan v. City of Cleveland Civil Service Commission Mitchel J. Brown Howard E. Rudolph and George v. Voinovich, Mayor, City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- John Brown v. Steve BrienenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.