Legal Opinion
Tabaka v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 16, 2009No. 06-CT-1026PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Per curiam
A jury found appellant guilty of driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI), operating a vehicle while impaired by alcohol (OWI), and operating a motor vehicle without an operator’s permit. The District government concedes that, if appellant’s conviction for DUI is upheld, her conviction for OWI must be vacated on remand as duplicative. We accept the government’s concession. See Santos v. District of Columbia, 940 A.2d 113, 114 (D.C.2007).
Appellant, for her part, assigns only one error affecting her DUI conviction: he argues that the trial judge erroneously refused to instruct the jury, in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Kleinbart v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Little v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- KRISHNA PATRICK MUIR v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIADistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Mitchell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. MurphySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- Zanders v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.