Legal Opinion

Callicoatte v. Callicoatte

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 13, 1967No. 4629PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a take-nothing judgment in a partition suit.

Plaintiff Albert Callicoatte filed suit against defendants Jewell Callicoatte and Laney Beard, Jr., for partition of 3 tracts of land in Harris County, alleging he and Jewell Callicoatte were husband and wife until 1966; that the 3 tracts were community property of himself and Jewell; that tracts A and B were in possession of Jewell, and tract C had been conveyed by Jewell to defendant Beard.

Defendants answered by general denial.

Trial was before the court without a jury which, after…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rains v. WheelerTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Breitling v. ChesterTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Burton v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  4. Cheek v. BellowsTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Callicoatte v. CallicoatteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Miller v. Miller, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
  2. Pritchard v. Estate of TuttleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. Amarillo National Bank v. ListonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Amarillo National Bank v. ListonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  5. Fazel Rahmani & Fort Worth Legacy Investments, L.P. v. Amy Sadeghian, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API