Legal Opinion
In Re the Arbitration Between Denihan & Denihan
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 15, 1987PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs. Insofar as the Appellate Division dismissed petitioner’s application to stay arbitration, we affirm for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Leonard H. Sandler (119 AD2d 144). To the extent that the Appellate Division granted an injunction pending determination of the issues raised in the arbitration, we conclude that the Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re the Arbitration between Denihan & DenihanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3Cited by5 opinions
- Olympia & York OLP Co. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- In re Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- In re the Arbitration between Guarini & SeveriniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Cove v. RosenblattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Longabardi v. GherardiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989