Legal Opinion

Finkelstein v. McClain

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 1938No. Appeals, 133 and 134PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Barnes,

This is an action in trespass to recover for personal injuries and property damage arising out of a collision of automobiles. On the evening of April 7, 1935, about 10:15 o’clock, the plaintiffs, husband and wife, were driving in an automobile owned by the wife-plaintiff, south on Miltenberger Street toward its intersection with the Boulevard of the Allies, in the City of Pittsburgh. The husband was driving the car, while his wife was riding in the rear seat. The Boulevard is forty feet wide, with four traffic lanes, two for east-bound and two for west-bound…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rodgers Et Ux. v. SaxtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Patterson v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Cormican v. MenkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Medvidovich v. SchultzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Janeway v. Lafferty Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Hess v. MummaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Koenig v. FlahertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Cobb v. ChubeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Dandridge v. Exhibitors Service Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API