Legal Opinion
United States v. Miller
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided December 15, 1966No. Cr. A. 1788PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CALEB M. WRIGHT, Chief Judge.
This is a criminal prosecution for violation of the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2312 (1948). The defendant moves to suppress certain evidence he alleges was procured in violation of his constitutional rights. The defendant further moves to dismiss the information on the ground that it is based on evidence obtained in violation of his constitutional rights.
At 11:45 a. m. on June 14, 1966 the defendant, Airman Third Class Michael Curtis Miller, was apprehended in possession of a stolen 1966 Ford Mustang automobile. 1 The arrest was made by an Air Policeman on the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Commonwealth v. HegginsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Moore v. Student Affairs Committee of Troy State UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1968
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- United States v. John Thomas FlowerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.