Legal Opinion
Portland Morris Plan Bank v. Winckler
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided September 19, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBassett, J.
This is an action of assumpsit by the payee to recover on a joint and several promissory note for $600, dated December 18, 1923, payable nine weeks after date, against the makers, Pauline A. and her husband, Oscar H. Winckler and Jacob L. Hackenberg, who signed for the accommodation of the Wincklers. They were defaulted. Hackenberg pleaded the general issue with brief statement that the note was obtained from him by the payee *308by fraud. Verdict for the defendant. The. case comes up to this court on exceptions and general motion.
EXCEPTIONS.
The note was given in renewal of an overdue note for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fleckner v. President of the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- Sundry Goods, Wares & Merchandises v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Liberty Trust Co. v. TiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Davis v. RandallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Cherokee County v. . MeroneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Public Motor Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co. of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Nelson v. Leo's Auto Sales, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1962
- Dutch v. ScribnerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955
- First Nat. Bank of Pittsfield v. MorongSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
- Delahanty v. Chicoine Motor Sales, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.