Legal Opinion

Delahanty v. Chicoine Motor Sales, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 1, 1956PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliamson, J.

On exceptions. This is an action in assumpsit to recover $285.15 for taxes paid to the defendant’s use. The defense is that the action is barred by a mutual release executed prior to the commencement of suit. The presiding Justice in the Superior Court, hearing the case without a jury, found for the defendant.

The evidence offered by the plaintiff, as stated in the bill of exceptions, may be summarized as follows:

For several years the plaintiff and the defendant were engaged in the operation of a used car lot in Berlin, New Hampshire, under the name of Twin Town Motors. Ostensibly the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bither v. PackardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1916
  2. Davis v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1887
  3. Coffin v. DodgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1950
  4. Prest v. Inhabitants of FarmingtonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1918
  5. Dresser v. KronbergSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1911

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barrett v. McDonald Investments, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  2. Barrett v. McDonald Investments, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API