Delahanty v. Chicoine Motor Sales, Inc.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtWilliamson, J.
On exceptions. This is an action in assumpsit to recover $285.15 for taxes paid to the defendant’s use. The defense is that the action is barred by a mutual release executed prior to the commencement of suit. The presiding Justice in the Superior Court, hearing the case without a jury, found for the defendant.
The evidence offered by the plaintiff, as stated in the bill of exceptions, may be summarized as follows:
For several years the plaintiff and the defendant were engaged in the operation of a used car lot in Berlin, New Hampshire, under the name of Twin Town Motors. Ostensibly the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bither v. PackardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1916
- Davis v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1887
- Coffin v. DodgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1950
- Prest v. Inhabitants of FarmingtonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1918
- Dresser v. KronbergSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1911
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Barrett v. McDonald Investments, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- Barrett v. McDonald Investments, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005