Legal Opinion
Calmat Company v. U.S. Department of Labor, Administrative Review Board Robert E. Germann
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 19, 2004No. 02-73199PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BETTY B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
CalMat Company (“CalMat”) petitions for review of a Final Decision and Order of the Department of Labor’s Administrative Review Board (ARB), holding that CalMat violated the whistleblower protection provision of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act (STAA), 49 U.S.C. §-31105, when it suspended Robert E. Germann without pay. We have jurisdiction under 49 U.S.C. § 31105(c), and we deny the petition for review.
I. BACKGROUND
After working nearly twenty years for CalMat, Germann was elected the local union shop steward in 1996. On April 25, 1998, a fellow…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- McDonald v. City of West BranchSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jeanette J. PLUMMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESTERN INTERNATIONAL HOTELS COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Burch v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2006
- David Weil v. Citizens Telecom Services Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Nikos Delano DorseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Alvarez v. United Parcel Service Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2005
- Ortiz v. Georgia PacificDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.