Wilderness Development, LLC v. Hash
District Court, D. Montana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JEREMIAH C. LYNCH, United States Magistrate Judge.
Defendants Nancy Hash and the Estate of David Hash, d/b/a Hash Tree Company move for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Defendants seek summary judgment dismissing all of Plaintiff Wilderness Development, LLC’s claims for relief. For the reasons stated below, the Court deems it appropriate to deny Defendants’ motion.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff is the developer of a golf course and residential community in Eureka, Montana. Defendants own and operate the Hash Tree Company located in Moscow, Idaho. This action arises from the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Shakur v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Nissan Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Ltd v. Fritz Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Barbara P. Hutchinson v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mid Continent Cas. Co. v. EngelkeDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2018