Legal Opinion

In Re Karcher

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 11, 1983PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

190 N.J. Super. 197 (1983)

462 A.2d 1273

IN THE MATTER OF ALAN J. KARCHER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SPEAKER OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND CARMEN A. ORECHIO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLANTS,

v.

THOMAS H. KEAN, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 8, 1983.

Decided May 11, 1983.

Before Judges MATTHEWS, ANTELL and FRANCIS.

Albert Burstein argued the cause for appellants (Rosen, Gelman & Weiss, attorneys; Leon J. Sokol and Michael D. Solomon of the firm of…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Myers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Springer v. Government of Philippine IslandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Jessen Associates, Inc. v. BullockTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Gangemi v. BerrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  5. State Ex Rel. Sego v. KirkpatrickNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Communications Workers of America v. FlorioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  2. Karcher v. KeanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. Cohen v. UMDNJ.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  4. Opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court Given Under the Provisions of Section 3 of Article VI of the ConstitutionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  5. De Vesa v. DorseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API