Legal Opinion

De Vesa v. Dorsey

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 23, 1993Published

1Opinion of the Court

134 N.J. 420 (1993)

634 A.2d 493

FRED DE VESA, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY; HON. MARIANNE ESPINOSA MURPHY, J.S.C.; JOHN H. ADLER, A MEMBER OF THE SENATE OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND WILBUR C. HANTEL, A CITIZEN OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, AND EDWARD T. O'CONNOR, JR., A MEMBER OF THE SENATE OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,

v.

JOHN H. DORSEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS A MEMBER OF THE SENATE OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY; DONALD DI FRANCESCO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PRESIDENT AND MEMBER OF THE SENATE OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY; WILLIAM L. GORMLEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CHAIR OF THE…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  3. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API