George C. Gilmore v. Bill Armontrout, George C. Gilmore v. Bill Armontrout
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Dissent
LAY, Chief Judge,
with whom HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge, and McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge, join, specially dissenting.
I respectfully dissent.
The legal prejudice involved in the prosecutor’s misleading and inaccurate argument clearly undermined the accuracy of Gilmore’s sentencing process. The procedural bar of Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72, 97 S.Ct. 2497, 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977), is applicable only where the claim is “devoid of [constitutional deficiencies which] undermine[ ] the accuracy of the guilt or sentencing determination.” Smith v. Murray, 477 U.S. 527, 538-39, 106 S.Ct. 2661, 2668, 91…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Caldwell v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Smith v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.