Legal Opinion
Public Service Co. of Oklahoma v. Crane Co.
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided December 12, 1969No. 69-C-51PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAUGHERTY, District Judge.
The Defendant Black & Veatch, Consulting Engineers, a partnership, moves to make certain insurance companies, who have paid a part but not all of Plaintiff’s loss, additional parties plaintiff herein pursuant to Rule 17(a), F.R. Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A. The Defendant Crane Company supports said Motion. The Plaintiff Public Service Company of Oklahoma opposes the Motion. The issue presented by this Motion has been briefed by the parties involved.
Our Circuit has held in Gas Service Company v. Hunt, 183 F.2d 417 (10 Cir. 1950), that upon timely motion insurance…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gas Service Co. v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- City Stores Company v. Lerner Shops of District of Columbia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- National Garment Co. v. New York, C. & St. LR Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
- Lowder v. Oklahoma Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Braniff Airways, Inc. v. FalkinghamDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1957
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Charles Casto v. The Arkansas-Louisiana Gas Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- Southern Nat. Bank of Houston, Tex. v. Tri Financial Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1970
- Public Service Company of Oklahoma, a Domestic Corporation v. Black & Veatch, Consulting Engineers, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Wattles v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1979
- Muskogee Title Co. v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of MuskogeeCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.