Legal Opinion

In the Interest of R.B.S.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided November 30, 2001No. 87,150PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beier, J.:

This appeal from a child in need of care (CINC) adjudication requires us to review the propriety of a newborn’s removal from the care of his parents before they took him home from the hospital. His parents challenge the district court’s explicit reliance on the previous death of the newborn’s older brother at the age of 5 months.

R.B.S. was bom on January 31,2001, at Cushing Memorial Hospital in Leavenworth. His parents, P.S. and L.S., had not made prior arrangements to deliver R.B.S. at Cushing, and L.S. had received no prenatal care. The couple lives in Atchison, but they chose to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Babe Houser Motor Co. v. TetreaultSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  2. Reynolds-Rexwinkle Oil, Inc. v. Petex, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  3. In the Interest of KesterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  4. In re EastHighland County Court of Common Pleas · 1972
  5. Calver v. HinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In the Interest of E.T.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
  2. In the Interest of A.H.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
  3. In Re RBSCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API