Legal Opinion

In the Interest of E.T.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 7, 2006No. 95,509PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Green, J.:

T.M., the natural mother, and M.T., the natural father, appeal from the trial court’s decision terminating their parental rights in E.T. (date of birth 10-10-04). First, T.M. and M.T. contend that the trial court lacked jurisdiction over E.T. under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA). We disagree. Although it appears that Missouri had jurisdiction under K.S.A. 38-1348(a)(2), the Missouri court declined to exercise jurisdiction on the ground that Kansas was the more appropriate forum. Therefore, a Kansas court could assume jurisdiction under K.S.A.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re the Adoption of B.M.W.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  2. In the Interest of J.L.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  3. In re S.M.H.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2005
  4. In the Interest of J.J.G.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2004
  5. McMurray v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In the Interest of B.D.-Y.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. State v. SalesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  3. In the Interest of M.B.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
  4. In re A.W.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  5. In the Interest of A.A.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API