Legal Opinion

State v. Lee

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 20, 1982No. 65232PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHULTZ, Justice.

Defendant, Barbara Nan Lee, appeals from her conviction by jury verdict of pandering in violation of section 725.3, The Code. She contends: (1) the trial court erred in finding that section 725.3 is not unconstitutionally vague and overbroad; (2) the evidence adduced at trial is insufficient to sustain her conviction; and (3) the trial court erred in not finding that the conduct of law enforcement officers constituted én-trapment as a matter of law. We find no merit in defendant’s contentions and affirm the trial court.

Defendant was tried jointly with Gilbert Mitchell…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. State v. PilcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  3. State v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  5. State v. WillisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  2. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  3. Ford v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  5. State v. WiltSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API