Vaught v. Satterfield
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Conley Byrd, Justice.
From a directed verdict in favor of appellees Norman Satterfield and his wife, the appellants Glen R. Vaught and his wife appeal contending that the failure of appellees to disclose a defect while selling their house to appellants constituted fraud upon which appellants were entitled to damages.
The record shows that in the early spring of 1971, the Satterfields owned a house at 810 “F” Street in North Little Rock. The house was constructed on a hillside lot that had been excavated in such manner that there was a steep incline sloping from the rear of the house up to the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lingsch v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Weikel v. SternsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
3Cited by7 opinions
- Superior Oil Co. v. FulmerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Jack B. Cohen, Betty L. Cohen v. Wedbush, Noble, Cooke, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Brookside Village Mobile Homes v. MeyersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Godwin v. HamptonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
- Copelin v. CorterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.