Legal Opinion

Vaught v. Satterfield

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 1, 1976No. 76-116PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Conley Byrd, Justice.

From a directed verdict in favor of appellees Norman Satterfield and his wife, the appellants Glen R. Vaught and his wife appeal contending that the failure of appellees to disclose a defect while selling their house to appellants constituted fraud upon which appellants were entitled to damages.

The record shows that in the early spring of 1971, the Satterfields owned a house at 810 “F” Street in North Little Rock. The house was constructed on a hillside lot that had been excavated in such manner that there was a steep incline sloping from the rear of the house up to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lingsch v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Weikel v. SternsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Superior Oil Co. v. FulmerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  2. Jack B. Cohen, Betty L. Cohen v. Wedbush, Noble, Cooke, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Brookside Village Mobile Homes v. MeyersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Godwin v. HamptonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
  5. Copelin v. CorterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API