Legal Opinion

Brookside Village Mobile Homes v. Meyers

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 16, 1990No. 89-241PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otis H. Turner, Justice.

The appellant, Brookside Village Mobile Homes, commenced this action to recover past due rental payments on a mobile home alleged to be due under a written agreement. Gail Meyers, the appellee, counterclaimed, alleging that the writing was a contract of sale and contending that she entered into the contractual arrangement as a result of Brook-side’s fraudulent conduct.

The circuit court, as trier of fact, held the contract to be one of sale entered into by Meyers as a result of Brookside’s deceit and rendered a judgment for the appellee in an amount equal to payments…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Storthz v. Commercial National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  2. Higgins v. HinesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  3. Vaught v. SatterfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Howell Petroleum Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. Samson Resources Company, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  2. Interstate Freeway Services, Inc. v. HouserSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Burford Distributing, Inc. v. StarrSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Merchants Commercial Bank v. Oceanside Village, Inc.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
  5. American Health Care Providers, Inc. v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API