Legal Opinion

(PC) McCoy v. Kelso

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 1, 2020No. 1:12-cv-00983Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH RAYMOND MCCOY, ) Case No.: 1:12-cv-000983-AWI-SAB (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 13 v. ) FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT’S MARCH 2, 2020 ORDER DENYING REQUEST 14 STRONACH, et al., ) FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL ) 15 Defendants. ) (Doc. No. 212) ) 16 ) 17 Plaintiff Joseph Raymond McCoy is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s “objections” to the Court’s February 19, 2020…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Palmer v. ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Haines v. Liggett Group Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  4. Harvest v. CastroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. Westlands Water DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API