Legal Opinion
Milliken-Tomlinson Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided November 25, 1925No. 1825Published
1Opinion of the Court
9 F.2d 809 (1925)
MILLIKEN-TOMLINSON CO.
v.
AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING CO.[*]
No. 1825.
Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
November 25, 1925.
Albert S. Woodman, of Portland, Me. (Woodman, Whitehouse & Littlefield, of Portland, Me., on the brief), for plaintiff in error.
William R. Pattangall, of Augusta, Me., and J. F. Abbott, of New York City (Pattangall, Locke & Perkins, of Augusta, Me., Leon V. Walker and Verrill, Hale, Booth & Ives, all of Portland, Me., and Hull, Abbott & Carpenter, of New York City, on the brief), for defendant in error.
Before BINGHAM and JOHNSON, Circuit Judges, and…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- McMullen v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Geddes v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Continental Wall Paper Co. v. Louis Voight & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- A. B. Small Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.