Legal Opinion

Monadnock Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Manning

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 7, 1977No. 7685PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrimes, J.

The issue in this case is whether the trial court erred in awarding the plaintiffs one-half the amount of the real estate commission for the sale of defendant’s property on the ground that its co-broker was not entitled to a commission.

Monadnock Insurance Agency, Inc., operated by John Weidner, and Marc P. Tieger d.b.a. Tieger Realty Company brought suit against the defendant Manning claiming a real estate commission as co-brokers in connection with the sale of a house by Manning to Richard and Patricia Pickford. The property had been listed with Monadnock, and Tieger as co-broker claimed to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. WalkerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1948
  2. Philbrick v. ChaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1948
  3. Byerts v. SchmidtNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Offutt & Oldham v. WintersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. Twardosky v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1948

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Easton Business Opportunities, Inc. v. Town Executive Suites-Eastern Marketplace, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Ira H. Shinberg v. Paul BrukCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  3. Belleau v. HopewellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  4. DiMarzio v. ReadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  5. Monadnock Insurance Agency, Inc. v. ManningSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API