Chudeusz v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORFINGER, Judge.
This appeal is submitted with an An-ders 1 brief, and we agree that no trial errors are demonstrated.
Defendant was convicted on Count I of attempted trafficking in excess of 100 pounds of cannabis, a second degree felony. On Count II, defendant was convicted of conspiracy to traffic in excess of 100 pounds of cannabis, a first degree felony. § 893.135(4), Fla.Stat. (1985). This *419statute requires that a person convicted of such conspiracy be punished “as if he had actually committed such prohibited act.” Therefore, under the conspiracy conviction, it was mandatory that defendant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- McDowell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- State v. NiemcowDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
3Cited by2 opinions
- Thrasher v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Suarez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994