Legal Opinion
State v. Rashid
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 22, 2009PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Respondent was not subject to civil management pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 10 where he had served his sentence for a 1988 rape and sodomy and was on parole for a nonsexual offense and, in September 2008, the Division of Farole gave notice identifying him as a possible “detained sex offender” nearing release from custody. The different consequences of a Sexual Offender Registration Act determination and the possibility of involuntary civil commitment under Mental Hygiene Law article *61610 (compare People v Knox, 12 NY3d 60 [2009], with Mental Hygiene Legal Serv. v Spitzer, 2007 WL…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. KnoxNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. FinleyNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- People v. BussNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- Rector v. Committee to Preserve St. Bartholomew's Church, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
3Cited by7 opinions
- State of New York v. RashidNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. NievesNew York Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. NelsonNew York Supreme Court · 2010
- STATE OF NEW YORK v. WILLIAMS, NUSHAWNAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.