Legal Opinion
Georg Jensen, Inc. v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 6, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDELSTEIN, District Judge.
These are two motions pursuant to Rule 54(d), F.R.C.P., 28 U.S.C., to review the actions of the clerk in taxing costs.
The underlying cause herein was a suit to recover $3,740 for documentary stamp taxes paid by plaintiff. Jurisdiction of the district court was founded upon 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a) (1). On cross-motions for summary judgment based on stipulated facts, judgment was granted for defendant. D.C., 173 F.Supp. 762. The Court of Appeals reversed, and ordered that judgment be entered for plaintiff. Georg Jensen, Inc. v. United States, 2 Cir., 275 F.2d 386.
Plaintiff’…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lichter Foundation, Inc. v. Russell A. Welch, Collector of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
- McConville v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- North Atlantic & Gulf S.S. Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- Aycrigg v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1954
- United States v. Mahlon C. MohrCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Van Hoomissen v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Director of Office of Thrift Supervision v. LopezDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1992
- 8 Fair empl.prac.cas. 725, 8 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9688 Dave Van Hoomissen, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant v. Xerox CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974