Legal Opinion
Matthews v. Workman
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 17, 2009No. 07-6209PublishedCited by 98 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
This matter is before the court on appellant’s Petition For Rehearing and Request for En Banc Consideration. That portion of the petition seeking panel rehearing is denied by the original panel members. We have determined, however, that sua sponte amendment of our original opinion is in order. Therefore, attached is an amended decision. The Clerk is directed to reissue the decision as amended nunc pro tunc to July 7, 2009.
The request for en banc consideration was circulated to all the judges of the court who are in regular active service. No judge called for a poll. Consequently, the…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Byrd v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Hooks v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Grant v. RoyalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Littlejohn v. TrammellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Ellis v. RaemischCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.