Legal Opinion
Tucci v. City of Syracuse
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 28, 1955PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtDel Vecchio, J.
This is a motion by defendant New York Central Eailroad to dismiss the cross claim of the defendant City of Syracuse upon the ground that the answer does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cross claim.under section 264 of the Civil Practice Act.
Plaintiff commenced this negligence action against the defendants City of Syracuse and New York Central Eailroad to recover for personal injuries allegedly sustained as a passenger in an automobile which collided with a railroad bumper owned by the defendant New York Central and located in Canal Street in the city of Syracuse. The answer of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Trustees of the Village of Canandaigua v. FosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Village of Port Jervis v. . First National B'k.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Nickelsburg v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Schrold v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Mills v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ling v. New York Central RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1956