Legal Opinion
Mills v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 5, 1947PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGarvin, J.
One of the third party defendants moves to dismiss a third party complaint, claiming that no canse of action is stated. An action against the City of New York to recover damages for personal injuries had theretofore been instituted by plaintiffs, one of whom claims to have been injured as the result of a dangerous condition of the sidewalk between premises Nos.' 1022 and 1024 St. Johns Place, Brooklyn, New York.
The complaint sets forth that plaintiff Louisa Mills fell as a result of a dangerous condition of said sidewalk which had been and was permitted to exist at the spot where plaintiff…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Trustees of the Village of Canandaigua v. FosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Nickelsburg v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Iroquois Gas Corp. v. International Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Toth v. Kennedy & Smith, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Herny v. FrankfortAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pamela Sutera, and James Sutera v. Go Jokir, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Govel v. LioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Green v. Hudson Shoring Co.New York Supreme Court · 1947
- Monteverdi v. French Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1947
- Great Eastern Fuel Co. v. PowellNew York Supreme Court · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.