Legal Opinion

Tolan v. Computervision Corp.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided October 12, 1988No. Civ. A. 85-1396-HPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HARRINGTON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs object to, and this Court therefore makes a de novo determination of, Magistrate Lawrence Cohen’s Report and Recommendation on: Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6); Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56; and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Certification of a Class pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23. 1

Plaintiffs Elliott Tolan, Stephen Rosen and Arthur Kalter allege that defendants Computervision Corporation (“Computervision”), Martin Allen, James Berrett, Richard Krieger and Philip Read…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Moskowitz v. LoppDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Chill v. Green Tree Financial Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
  3. In Re Bank of Boston Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
  4. Hurley v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989
  5. Grace v. Perception Technology Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API