Legal Opinion

Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Phelps

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 24, 1933No. 24584PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUSBY, j.

This is an original action commenced in this court for the purpose of obtaining a review of an order and award of the State Industrial Commission. The petitioners! are the employer and insurance carrier and the respondent is the claimant. Por the purpose of convenience the parties will be referred to in this opinion as petitioners and claimant, respectively, excepting in case where it is necessary to differentiate between the employer and insurance carrier.

The award complained of directed the payment of compensation for permanent partial disability based upon a 15 per cent, loss of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Geis Price Grain Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Loffland Bros. Drilling Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. G. S. & C. Drilling Co. v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Boettcher v. Marland Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Carl B. King Drilling Co. v. FarleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sinclair Prairie Oil Co. v. StevensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  2. Empire Oil & Refining Co. v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Simon v. Amerada Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API