Stucky v. Stucky
Nebraska Supreme Court
1DissentNewton, J.
I respectfully dissent from the- majority opinion in this case. That opinion presents a beautiful edifice built Upon a completely false .foundation.. It is true .that the terms “residence” and “domicile”.are not.always synonymous. It is also true that the. authorization .by. a Legis-. lature for the service, of summons, giving a. court jurisdiction' in personam if based, up ón'.either .domicile or resi-r *643dence is sufficient to meet the requirements of the constitutional due process clause. Milliken v. Meyer, 311 U. S, 457, 61 S. Ct. 339, 85 L. Ed. 278, 132 A. L. R. 1357. It is also possible…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Estin v. EstinSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Vanderbilt v. VanderbiltSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Mizner v. MiznerNevada Supreme Court · 1968
- Rhoades v. RhoadesNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.