Legal Opinion

Concordia Mercantile Co. v. Commercial National Bank

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 7, 1952No. 38,589, 38,620PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

The present appeals arise from an order of the district court allowing claims against the receiver of an insolvent corporation, as more fully set out later.

Generally speaking, the contentions made by the appellants and by the appellee are of law, and no attack is made on the voluminous conclusions of fact made by the trial court. From those conclusions, as finally framed, the following is deduced.

For many years the Concordia Mercantile Company of Concordia, Kan., hereafter referred to as the company, and of which Donald E. Bolman was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Merrill v. National Bank of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. First American Bank & Trust Co. v. Town of Palm BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  3. Blitz ex rel. Erickson v. MetzgerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  4. Spire v. SpireSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  5. American National Bank v. BranchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  2. Mountain Iron & Supply Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  3. The Peoples State Bank of Ellinwood, Kansas, and Marian Isern v. Marlette Coach CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  4. Morris v. Jack B. Muir Irrevocable Trust (In Re Muir)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1988
  5. Farmers State Bank v. FriesenCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API