Legal Opinion

State v. Newcomb

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 18, 1978No. 7726SC962PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

Several of defendant’s assignments of error are directed to the sufficiency of the evidence. To justify the conviction of defendant as an accessory before the fact, the jury must find that he aided or advised the parties who committed the offense, that he was not present when the offense was committed, and that the principal did commit the offense. State v. Sauls, 291 N.C. 253, 230 S.E. 2d 390 (1976), cert. den., 431 U.S. 916, 97 S.Ct. 2178, 53 L.Ed. 2d 226 (1977); State v. Bass, 255 N.C. 42, 120 S.E. 2d 580 (1961). Venecia Crews admitted that she sold marijuana. All the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. BarefootSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. PeeleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. State v. SaulsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. EssickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API