Legal Opinion

Men of Measure Clothing, Inc. v. Men of Measure, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided January 28, 1986Published

1Opinion

OPINION ON PETITION TO REHEAR

Appellant’s petition asserts the court erred in following federal case authority decided under the Lanham Act and suggests federal and Tennessee case law differ in that the latter presumably predicates infringement of state tradename rights on demonstrated public consumer confusion. Neither Century Homes nor other Tennessee decisions support this conclusion. Century Homes essentially states what both federal authority and general principles of trade-mark law hold, viz., that the central test for trade-mark or trade name infringement is “likelihood of confusion”.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Amp Incorporated v. Howard J. Foy, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
  2. Schwinn Bicycle Company v. Murray Ohio Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
  3. Schwinn Bicycle Co. v. Murray Ohio Manufacturing Co.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1971
  4. DCA Food Industries Inc. v. Hawthorn Mellody, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
  5. Kay Jewelry Co. of Chattanooga v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API