Legal Opinion

Schwinn Bicycle Company v. Murray Ohio Manufacturing Company

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 24, 1972No. 72-1158PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from the District Court’s judgment for Defendant-Appellee, Murray Ohio, in a suit by Plaintiff-Appellant, Schwinn, seeking damages and injunctive relief against Murray Ohio’s alleged trademark infringement and unfair competition. 1 Because the District Court’s Memorandum Opinion, appearing at 339 F.Supp. 973, thoroughly sets forth the factual and legal bases for that Court’s judgment, we will restate only so much of the case as is necessary to consider the issues raised by Schwinn on this appeal.

Both Schwinn and Murray Ohio are manufacturers of bicycles and, more…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. West Point Manufacturing Company v. Detroit Stamping CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
  2. Schwinn Bicycle Co. v. Murray Ohio Manufacturing Co.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1971

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Union Carbide Corporation v. Ever-Ready Incorporated, a Corporation, and Mark Gilbert, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  2. In re Morton-Norwich Products, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
  3. Miguel Torres v. Cantine Torresella S.R.L., Assignee of S. Margherita S.P.A.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  4. Hindu Incense, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Charles Meadows and Dorothy Meadows, Defendants-Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  5. Money Store v. Harriscorp Finance, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API