Little v. Widener
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.
This suit, arising in a justice court, is to recover damages for breach of a warranty in the sale of a paint gun. There was a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $500' .and defendants have appealed.
The facts show that in March, 1927, plaintiff, who was a painter,, -purchased a DeVilbiss paint gun from defendants who were implement dealers doing business in Kansas City under the trade name ¡of the Southwest Pump and Machinery • Company. Defendants: were agents and distributors for the type of gun in question and the ¡equipment necessary for its operation. The paint gun was…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- De Witt v. BerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Hinchman v. Point Defiance Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
- Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. BaskettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
- State ex rel. United Railways Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
- International Pavement Co. v. Smith, Beggs & Ranken Machine Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1885
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brandtjen & Kluge, Inc. v. HunterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1940
- Berk v. Gordon Johnson CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1964
- Illinois State Bank of Quincy v. PedersenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
- Davies v. Motor Radio Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1951
- Ford Motor Co. v. CullumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.