Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Fields

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 1952No. Appeals, 229 to 282PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

The defendants were jointly tried and were convicted of common law rape and robbery. On return of the verdicts the trial judge peremptorily refused their motions for new trials, without argument, and sentenced the defendants. Their present counsel in arguing these appeals impugned the fairmindedness of the judge in the trial of these cases. We have serious doubt as to the validity of the convictions of these defendants on the present record. And regardless of whether inadequacies in this record amount to reversible error, this is a case in which we. are impelled to grant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. QuarantaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Commonwealth v. RansomSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Commonwealth v. KostanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Commonwealth v. BallesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Commonwealth v. DilsworthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BartellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Commonwealth v. DouglassSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Commonwealth v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Commonwealth v. BuckleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Commonwealth v. LomaxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API