Legal Opinion

(PC) Kiger v. Johnson

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 21, 2025No. 2:23-cv-01263Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHNATHAN HOWARD KIGER, No. 2:23-cv-01263 DC SCR P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 TRACY JOHNSON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights 18 action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s third amended complaint (“TAC”) is before the 19 undersigned for screening. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiff’s TAC fails to state any 20 cognizable claims for relief. Plaintiff will be given one more opportunity to file an amended 21…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API