Turner v. Sioux City & Pacific Railroad
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Washington county. Tried below before Wakeley, J. cited: Drake on Attachment, 5th Ed., § 711. Albrecht v. Treitschke, 17 Neb., 205. cited: Peters v. Dunnells, 5 Neb., 465. Maxwell’s PI. and Pr., Ed. 1880, p. 76.’ Conley v. Chilcote, 25 Ohio State, 320. Moore v. P. R., 43 Iowa, 385.
1Opinion of the Court
Maxwell, Ch. J.
This is an action brought by the plaintiff against the defendant to recover for wages claimed to be due for services rendered by the plaintiff to the defendant in 1883.
The defendant filed an answer in-which it admits that on the 12th day of November, 1883, it was indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of twenty dollars, but that on said day it was garnished in an action then pending in the county court of Washington county, wherein Downing & Co. were plaintiffs, and the plaintiff. herein defendant. The third count „of the answer, which contains the facts relied upon as a defense…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bills v. MasonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- DeWitt v. Wheeler & Wilson Sewing Machine Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by6 opinions
- Baumgardner v. Southern Pac. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1943
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. FlemingNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- American Central Insurance v. HettlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. SmershNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. McDonaldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.