Legal Opinion
Atkins v. Ferro Corp.
District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Decided February 11, 2008No. Civil Action 03-945-JVP-CN, 03-946-JVP-CN, 04-627-JVP-CN, 04-759-JVP-CN, 04-760-JVP-CN, 04-766-JVP-CN, 04-767-JVP-CNPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTIONS
JOHN V. PARKER, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on a motion for summary judgment, filed by defendants, Ferro Corporation and Edward Frindt 1 (“defendants”) (doc. 185) in these consolidated actions and a motion for summary judgment, filed by plaintiffs, Rodney Atkins, et al. (“Plaintiffs”) (doc. 194). Defendants filed a memorandum in support of their motion (doc. 186), as well as a statement of uncontested material facts (doc. 187). Plaintiffs opposed defendants’ motion (doc. 188), filed a memorandum in support of their motion (doc. 194-2) and a statement of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Templet v. Hydrochem Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. AlbrightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Bradford v. Citgo Petroleum Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Emma Bradford v. Citgo Petroleum CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- LaSalle v. Sasol North AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2022
- LaSalle v. Sasol North AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.