Looper v. State

ON REHEARING.

January 16, 1924.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

— Appellant Appellant renews substantially the same contentions made by him in the original presentation of this case. He seems to think that it was the duty of the learned trial judge because the accused .had no lawyer, to interpose objections and in some way prevent the introduction of evidence to which no objection was made upon the trial and which is now urged as erroneously allowed. When appellant was testifying in his own behalf he was asked by the State’s attorney if he had ever been convicted for selling intoxicating liquor and replied…