People v. Spraic
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
SHAW, J., pro tem.
Defendant was tried on an information charging him in two counts with murder of Homer E. Ranes and Mildred Ranes, who were husband and wife, and was convicted of manslaughter on each count. He appeals from the judgment and “from the verdict.” The law authorizes no appeal from a verdict, and hence the latter appeal is nugatory, but all the points made may be considered on the appeal from the judgment.
Appellant’s first point relates to the procedure on the impanelment of the jury. When the first twelve prospective jurors were seated in the box defendant questioned them as to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. ScogginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- People v. ThomsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Durbin v. HillmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- People v. LamarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- People v. SaenzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. AlcaldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- People v. IsbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- State v. FouquetteNevada Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. McClellanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. RigneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.