Mervis v. Elm Street Realty Trust
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtGreco, J.
This is an action pursuant to a financing contingency clause in the parties’ purchase and sale agreement to recover a deposit paid by the plaintiffs as prospective buyers of the defendants’ real estate. After trial, judgment was entered for the defendant-sellers, and the plaintiffs filed this Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A., Rule 8C appeal.
A malfunction in the recording device at trial prevented the plaintiffs from obtaining a cassette tape and preparing a transcript. While the reconstructed record, see Rule 8C(e), before us is not very clear, the following facts appear. On July 12,1996, the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Lynch v. AndrewMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
- Lynn v. NashawatyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
- Stabile v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
- Macone Bros. v. StraussMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Meier v. PastuisacaMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2004