Legal Opinion

Mervis v. Elm Street Realty Trust

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided February 9, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGreco, J.

This is an action pursuant to a financing contingency clause in the parties’ purchase and sale agreement to recover a deposit paid by the plaintiffs as prospective buyers of the defendants’ real estate. After trial, judgment was entered for the defendant-sellers, and the plaintiffs filed this Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A., Rule 8C appeal.

A malfunction in the recording device at trial prevented the plaintiffs from obtaining a cassette tape and preparing a transcript. While the reconstructed record, see Rule 8C(e), before us is not very clear, the following facts appear. On July 12,1996, the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Lynch v. AndrewMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  3. Lynn v. NashawatyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  4. Stabile v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  5. Macone Bros. v. StraussMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Meier v. PastuisacaMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API