Legal Opinion

Meier v. Pastuisaca

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided June 8, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWelsh, J.

This is an action to recover a deposit payable under a purchase and sale agreement. The plaintiff (seller) entered into an agreement to sell her home at 55 Partridge Valley Road in West Yarmouth to the defendant (buyer) for the sum of $265,000. The sum of $500 was paid as a binder. The agreement required that $26,000 be paid upon execution of the agreement by the parties. The agreement contained a mortgage contingency clause which gave the buyer the option to terminate the agreement and to a return of the deposit if he were unable to obtain a mortgage financing agreement of $238,500 (i.e.,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. DeVaux v. American Home Assurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Leigh v. RuleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  3. Lynch v. AndrewMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  4. Kelly v. MarxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  5. Schilling v. LevinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Russell v. RibeiroMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API