Legal Opinion
People v. Robinson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 20, 1990PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in permitting the jury to use transcripts of tape recordings of cocaine sales played at the trial (see, People v Lubow, 29 NY2d 58). The tapes were audible enough to be transcribed by a third party, and the transcripts were reviewed for accuracy by the informant who purchased the cocaine (see, People v Mincey, 64 AD2d 615). After a hearing, the court found the tapes to be audible. At the trial, the informant testified that the tapes were fair and accurate recordings of the conversations he…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. LubowNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- People v. FeldNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- People v. MinceyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- People v. WarnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. KussAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. CruzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. AdeolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. GkaniosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. WadeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.