Legal Opinion

Deason v. Dobson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 25, 1948No. 6 Div. 669PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

On a former appeal the equity of the hill as last amended and the sufficiency of the agreement to comply with the statute of frauds was sustained, and the rule as to the admissibility of the evidence to make certain the general description of the property in the receipt given by the defendant for the cash payment was fully stated. Dobson et al. v. Deason et al., 248 Ala. 496, 28 So.2d 418.

The issues of fact as to what constituted the property “known as Millport Motor Company at Millport, Alabama,” owned by the respondent at the time of the negotiations between the parties, was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Minge v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Kelly's Heirs v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  3. Springle's Heirs v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850
  4. Dobson v. DeasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  5. Olsson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Madison Limestone Company v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  2. Peddicord v. PeddicordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  3. Jones v. McGivernSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  4. Golden v. GoldenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  5. Pickard v. OsburnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API