Legal Opinion

Camacho v. the State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 9, 2017No. A17A1253PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Self, Judge.

Following a jury trial, Marcos Benitez Camacho was convicted of trafficking in methamphetamine. Camacho appeals the denial of his amended motion for new trial, asserting that the trial court erred (1) in charging the jury on the law of deliberate ignorance, (2) in allowing the State to impeach Camacho by questioning him about a previous, unrelated arrest, (3) in admitting hearsay testimony, and (4) in permitting the State to make prejudicial remarks in closing argument. Finding no error, we affirm.

Viewed in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, the evidence showed that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. SchleiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  2. Earnest v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
  3. United States v. James W. StoneCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  4. Cape v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  5. Philmore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lowery v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  2. Susan Lorraine Weidman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  3. Victor Grullon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API